The Abstract Elephant on the Wall

Above Photo Credit: Construction by Morgan Johnson. See Morgan's full collection HERE.

Let's say the thing out loud instead of walking past it the way our visitors do: most galleries hang non-representational work, put up a title card, and hope. No framing conversation, no prompt, nothing from the staff on the floor beyond “let me know if you have questions.” Then everyone's mildly surprised when the abstract piece gets a polite glance and a walk-by while the landscape next to it gets an actual conversation.

That's not a mystery. That's a gap we built.

I've spent this month writing about this same problem from two other angles — what it feels like from the collector's side (a genuine, instant reaction that has nowhere to go), and what it takes from the artist's side (learning to hand a stranger one honest sentence instead of a paragraph or nothing at all). This is the third piece, and it's the one aimed at us. Because whatever the collector feels and whatever the artist says, none of it reaches anyone, if the gallery itself does nothing with it.

I know gallery owners who won't take on non-representational work at all, specifically because of this. Their logic is straightforward: if the art has real value, it should sell itself, and in their experience, abstraction doesn't. I'd push back on the conclusion, not the observation.

They're right that it doesn't sell itself. Almost nothing worth having does. A good bottle of wine doesn't sell itself without someone telling you where it's from and why it's worth the price. A good book doesn't sell itself without a jacket that hooks you before page one.

The fact that non-representational work needs a gallery to do some work on its behalf isn't a mark against the work, it's a description of the job. Declining to carry it because it asks something of you isn't a business decision. It's mistaking “requires effort” for “not worth the effort.”

So, let's be precise about what that job actually is, because it depends on what kind of room you're running. If you're a commercial gallery, you are, first and foremost, in the business of selling art. If you're a museum or a nonprofit, your task is exposing people to different kinds of art and expanding their appreciation of it. Those are genuinely different missions. But both of them require exactly the same underlying principle to succeed, and neither one is accomplished by hanging a painting on a wall and expecting the visitor to do the heavy lifting themselves.

Here's what should make that easier than it sounds: none of what follows requires an art theory background, from your visitor or from your staff. A child can do this.

Why did you pick that color? Why did you paint it that way instead of some other way? How does it make you feel? Those questions work on a six-year-old and they work on a museum board member, because neither one requires expertise, they ask for a reaction, and everyone standing in the room already has one. Our job as professionals is to bridge that gap for whoever walks through the door, first-time visitor or fifty-year collector alike.

Make the art accessible. Make it relatable. Make the connection.

Those two or three questions are a real start on their own, don't let the idea that you need a longer script talk you out of just asking them. But if you want a slightly fuller kit, a few more that work well, whether they come from a docent, a wall prompt, or a director working a reception floor:

What's the first word that comes to mind, before you think about it?

Where does your eye go first — and where does it end up?

If this painting made a sound, what would it be?

What do you think was happening for the artist while they made this?

We use a version of this same short list internally when we're writing about non-representational work for the wall or the website; it turns out the questions that unlock a description are the same ones that unlock a conversation on the floor. Ask one, actually wait for the answer, and you've already done more for that piece than a paragraph of wall text ever will.

We told artists this same month not to hand a stranger a paragraph about their own work. That one honest, specific sentence does more than a full explanation ever will. The same discipline applies to us, maybe more so, because it's tempting for a gallery to over-narrate on an artist's behalf, especially when the artist isn't in the room to do it themselves.

Don't paraphrase an artist's intention into a lecture. Use their actual words, briefly, and then get out of the way. If an artist told you “painting this was extremely cathartic: I picked my favorite colors and just drew from raw energy,” say exactly that, in their voice, and then ask the visitor what they notice now that they know it. That's the whole move: one true sentence, then a question that hands the moment back to them. Not a docent essay. Not gallery-speak about “exploring tension and resolution.” Their words, your question, their looking.

Think about how this actually plays out. You spent untold hours developing and curating this exhibit. Deciding what hangs next to what, how it's lit, how a visitor's eye should move through the room before they've even stepped inside it. Are you really going to leave the last three feet, the actual moment a person stands in front of the piece, entirely to chance?

None of what I'm describing here is a script for closing a sale in the moment, and it shouldn't be treated like one. It's about getting a visitor to actually invest something — a first word, a guess about where their eye traveled, an honest “I don't know, but it's doing something to me” before they've decided the piece isn't for them.

A visitor who's given even sixty seconds of real engagement is a visitor who remembers the piece, remembers your gallery, and comes back to look again. That's true whether they buy this month, donate next year, or just walk out having genuinely seen something for the first time. Simply displaying a piece and leaving the rest to the personal examination of an audience nobody prepared for it isn't a neutral choice, for a gallery or a nonprofit. It costs the sale. It costs the mission. It costs both at once.

What's one question you could start asking on your own floor this month~ at a reception, at a first-time visitor's elbow, on a wall card, that might turn a walk-by into a conversation? Try it once and tell me what happened.

~ Nicole Graham

Enjoying The Curator's Inbox? Subscribe here to get every issue delivered to your inbox.

Also from Nicart: 
Palette to Placement — the newsletter for working artists navigating the gallery world. Subscribe 
On View — art news, events, and collecting insights for Oregon Coast art lovers. Subscribe

Follow The Curator's Inbox on Facebook → https://www.facebook.com/thecuratorsinbox